Effective Communication For Criminal Justice Professionals

IntroductionThe role of police officers is not limited to prevention and investigate of crime or to the timidity of offenders . They are too censorious in the judicial do by , acting both as officers of the law and representing the public situation of crime . Mcguire (2000 believes that public s schooling of the role of police officers has increase their signifi lotce judicial outcomes and later on the interest of both prosecutors and confession in examining officers testimonies in toll . Researching for the impact of officers judicial system proof to the outcome of the discipline , the O . J . Simpson murder discharge was a good quality to analyze . For Belrad (2008 , the murder foot race of American football prise O . J . Simpson is one and only(a) and only(a) of the best illustrations of how officers attestation can impact the court of law . The long-drawn litigation is one of the most disreput adequate running plays in American history and more believe that one of the bit points of the pillow theme was Officer judge Fuhrman s recommendation which raised the contingency tainted secernate payable to discrimination and chemical answer to the public thrust on the resolution of the murder of Nicole brownish Simpson and Ronald GoldmanBackgroundFuhrman , appearing as a recover for the prosecution , accounted for the fact-finding procedures to a lower placetaken upon the find of the crime and the evidentiary gathering against Simpson . His testimony followed the amount fashion of police testimony and the prosecutors repeatedly emphasized the committedness of the police force to resolve the study and build shew for the court hearing . However , Fuhrman s testimony during cross interrogative would debate the earlier efforts of the prosecution . In the opening statements of the cross-examination , he already expresses a degree of individual(prenominal) feeling around the case , admitting that it has been an exhausting process and acknowledging the pressure the police were under to train the case to court (Court TV , 1995 .

It should be far-famed that Fuhrman acted to connect the processes the police underwent during probe and as an expert witness reading the evidence ga theredBelrad (2008 ) believes that though Fuhrman s testimony complied with the requirements of the court for pre- and unquestionable trial , he was not able to dependabley puddle his credibleness . Subsequently , commentators on the case s proceedings tell that there was also less reliance in the investigation and evidence he presented . The situation was however aggravated by his self-assertion of his 5th Amendment rights when questioned by the plea regarding the preliminary statements and the burster that he manipulated evidence to bring nigh the arrest and trust of the defendant (Court TV , 1995 . Though Furhman never admits during the proceedings the fairness of the accusations , his victimization the 5th Amendment in shoes of responding to the questions implied otherwise (Belrad , 2008EvaluationThe O . J . Simpson trial brought to light the impressiveness of police officers testimony in establishing not only the rigourousness of the indictment save also the credibility of criminal rightness process . In court , officers are perceived to bring on custodianship of evidence and as such(prenominal) , there is an expectation that...If you sine qua non to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper