Leadership and power Essay

We have described power as the capacity to cause change and capture as the degree of material change in a targets behaviors. Ho Chings power as a leader has been recognized by many, only when would you describe Ho Ching as an influential leader? Why? Yes Ho Ching would be an influential leader because she has the capabilities to persuade others to follow her lead2.Based on the excerpt from Ho Chings speech, what type of t symboliseics does she use to influence the behavior of others? Ho Ching use coercive power to direct her followers3. Ho Ching has been named one of the most powerful leaders in Asia. What ar her major sources of power? Her major resource of power came mainly on her connections mostly her husbandReview the Leader Motives in Ch. 5 of leading Enhancing the Lessons of Experience. How would you char exploiterize Ho Chings motives? Her motives were to build a better human relationship with India and help Singapore grow.Review Highlight 5.3 in Leadership Enhancing t he Lessons of Experience. What role, if any, do managerial differences based on gender play here? there are managerial differences based on gender Females tend to exertion with the organizations broad interests in attempt mind, consider how others felt up nearly the influence, involve others in planning, and focus on both the childbed and interpersonal aspects of the situation. Male managers, on the other hand, were more promising to act out of self-interest, show less consideration for how others might feel round the influence attempt, work alone in developing their strategy, and focus in general on the task alone.Malemanagers, on the other hand, were more likely to act out of self-interest, show less consideration for how others might feel about the influence attempt, work alone in developing their strategy, and focus mainly on the task alone. Female managers were less likely than male managers to compromise or negotiate during their influence attempts. The female manager s were actually more likely to persist in trying to persuade their superiors, even to the point of clean-cut opposition. Although their managerial styles were different neither group was more effective than the other.